CM meets Guv, seeks EC letter on office-of-profit to clear confusion prevailing in state

Ranchi: Chief Minister Hemant Soren met Governor Ramesh Bais at the Raj Bhawan on Thursday demanding a copy of the letter the Election Commission of India had sent to the governor giving its opinion regarding the action which can be taken in case of the office of profit case.

He also handed over a letter to the Governor through which he claimed that the main opposition party of the state the BJP is creating confusion in the state by taking the letter of the ECI and said how important it is for him to get a copy of the letter in the interest of the state.

During the meeting, the Chief Minister also presented his points in the Angada Mines Lease case and urged the governor to give him an opportunity for a reasonable hearing at the earliest so that the atmosphere of uncertainty which is dangerous for a healthy democracy can be removed and Jharkhand moves forward on the path of progress and development.

Chief Minister Soren told the Governor that since February 2022 the role is being played by the BJP that he will be disqualified from the assembly on the basis of his taking a stone mining lease.

He said that the BJP also lodged a complaint in this regard whereas in many judgments of the Supreme Court it has been said that by taking a mining lease a legislator does not become eligible for disqualification under the provision of section 9 (a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. 

Hemant Soren expressed his concern about the delay in disclosure of the content of the ECI’s letter as it had given the BJP an opportunity to give its biased opinion before the opinion of the ECI. Demanding early disclosure of the content said earlier he pointed that on September 1 a UPA delegation had also met the Governor for this and they were assured early disclosure of the content.

The development took place a day after the Soren cabinet approved a proposal for recognising those as locals whose ancestors had been staying in Jharkhand since before 1932 and thus triggered a debate in the state on its legality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.